(We've moved to: http://christinesleeter.org/new-zealand-family/)
In her book about the New Zealand McCullough family entitled Kin: A Collective Biography (published in 2005 by Canterbury Press), Melanie Nolan challenges us to think about the relationship between broad social structures (her main interest is social class and gender), individual agency, and the nexus of family. She explains that, “We choose our friends, our social networks and, to some extent, our communities in a way that we do not choose our family. Yet . . . family can influence where you live, what work you do, your political allegiance” (p. 187).
In her book about the New Zealand McCullough family entitled Kin: A Collective Biography (published in 2005 by Canterbury Press), Melanie Nolan challenges us to think about the relationship between broad social structures (her main interest is social class and gender), individual agency, and the nexus of family. She explains that, “We choose our friends, our social networks and, to some extent, our communities in a way that we do not choose our family. Yet . . . family can influence where you live, what work you do, your political allegiance” (p. 187).
A friend who knew of my interest in family history sent me
this book. I kept putting it aside to get to “later” for quite a while. Part of
the reason was probably that even though I have spent much time in New Zealand,
I wasn’t sure how a history of a New Zealand family would speak to my own work
in the U.S. Once I opened it and started reading, however, I realized that the
book sheds useful light on the relationship between studying family and
studying history.
Nolan is a labor historian who grapples with the tension
between studying the large picture of class formation as it played out
historically in a specific country, and the particulars of individuals within a
working class family. She argues that histories, which tend to be broad and sweeping,
obscure experiences of subgroups and individuals. On
the other hand, biographies and family histories, while rich in detail, are
usually parochial, saying little about the historical landscape in which people
lived. Ultimately, she argued that there is tremendous normal variation in how
people live and shape social relationships; that variation is part of history
and important to understand. Family history can unearth what normal variation
looks like.
The McCullough family, which is the subject of her book, was
not her own family. As a graduate student, she delved into the biography of Jack McCullough,
who was a New Zealand artisan working class leader in the late 1800s and early
1900s. However, as she carefully read his diary and reflected on it in
relationship to her own academic background (such as her interest in gender and
history), she began to see many more dimensions both in his life and in working class
experiences. By expanding her inquiry to his four siblings and their families,
she was able to present a complex portrait of the New Zealand working class.
The five siblings shared having grown up in a working class
immigrant family, but their lives represent different ways to be working class
in New Zealand. Jack McCullough represents the skilled working class, committed
to activist unionism and an international socialist vision of society. Margaret
McCullough Norrie, who became an evangelical Christian, represents a religious
“other worldly” vision of a large number of working class women. Jim McCullough
represents locally active “municipal socialists” who devoted their attention to
quality of life issues, friend societies (especially the International Order
of Oddfellows), and family economic independence. Sarah McCullough Kennedy represents
the “ordinary” working class women whose domestic, non-activist lives of
patriotism, conservatism, and religion formed the foundation of New Zealand
working class family life. Finally, Frank McCullough represents white collar managers
who worked their way up, and as managers espoused values of
teamwork, personal development, and good character.
Situated within larger formations of class, ethnicity, and religion, families embed us in the experiences and ideological
contexts of those interconnected social locations. Studying the family and its
historic and cultural context can reveal roots of our own values and
perspectives today. Yet those social locations do not determine an individual’s
life – there is an interplay between individual shaping of consciousness and
choices, and that shaped within family, which one does not choose. What I appreciate
about this book is her probing of that interplay.
No comments:
Post a Comment